Decline in Academic Reputation Scores of US Law Schools: Study by Robert Jones

A recent study by Robert Jones, an associate professor of law at Northern Illinois University College of Law, has revealed a decline in the academic reputation scores of law schools in the United States over the past 25 years. Jones analyzed U.S. News & World Report rankings from 1998 to 2022, shedding light on the changing perceptions of law schools among professors.
 
The study found that only 15.1% of the surveyed law schools reported an increase of 0.3% or more in their academic reputation scores, while nearly half experienced a decline. This raises questions about the factors contributing to this trend and the competitiveness of the legal education market.
 

All in the last week in the last month in the last 3 months in the last 6 months in the last year

Search Career Advice

Jones attributes the decline in reputation scores to the competitive landscape in which law schools operate. Schools compete for top professors, students, and resources, and they strive to outperform each other in terms of outcomes such as bar passage rates and employment prospects. The rankings themselves play a significant role, as improvements in one law school's ranking often come at the expense of others.
 
Moreover, Jones argues that law schools cannot afford to be lenient or generous when evaluating their peers. They must maintain rigorous standards to maintain their institution's reputation.
 

• Search Legal Jobs
• Search Articles
• Employer Listing

United States

Search jobs

All in the last week in the last month in the last 3 months in the last 6 months in the last year

Search Career Advice

Select In-House Law Firms Government Recruiters Public Interest

Search Employer

Jones also found a correlation between a law school's academic reputation scores and the number of applicants it receives. When the number of applications declines, the scores tend to diminish, and vice versa. Although not a perfect correlation, this trend suggests that the future of academic reputation scores depends on broader developments in the legal education landscape.
 
In a previous analysis in 2013, Jones compared academic reputation scores determined by academics with those assigned by judges and practitioners. The results revealed a significant disparity between the two groups, with judges and practitioners assigning higher scores than academics. Only a few law schools improved their academic reputation scores by 0.3% or more, while a substantial 48% of the data set showed improvements in judge/attorney scores during the same period.
 
To address the challenge of improving academic reputation scores, Jones suggests that smaller law schools consider merging or affiliating with larger universities with established name recognition. Additionally, law school leaders should converse with counterparts at institutions that have successfully raised their scores over the past 25 years. These conversations may yield valuable recommendations that can be implemented in the short and long term.
 
As the legal education landscape continues to evolve, understanding the dynamics of law school reputation scores becomes crucial for institutions aiming to enhance their standing. Jones' study provides valuable insights into the competitive nature of legal education and the complexities of academic reputation assessments. By identifying trends and exploring strategies for improvement, law schools can adapt to the changing environment and strengthen their positions in the field.