var googletag = googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().disableInitialLoad(); });
device = device.default;
//this function refreshes [adhesion] ad slot every 60 second and makes prebid bid on it every 60 seconds // Set timer to refresh slot every 60 seconds function setIntervalMobile() { if (! return if (adhesion) setInterval(function(){ googletag.pubads().refresh([adhesion]); }, 60000); } if(device.desktop()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [468, 60], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if(device.tablet()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if( { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } googletag.cmd.push(function() { // Enable lazy loading with... googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ // Fetch slots within 5 viewports. // fetchMarginPercent: 500, fetchMarginPercent: 100, // Render slots within 2 viewports. // renderMarginPercent: 200, renderMarginPercent: 100, // Double the above values on mobile, where viewports are smaller // and users tend to scroll faster. mobileScaling: 2.0 }); });

Americans for Effective Law Enforcement (AELE)

( 92 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.
Americans for Effective Law Enforcement (AELE)

P.O. Box 75401

Chicago, IL 60675-5401
Tel. 1 (847) 685-0700
Fax 1 (847) 685-9700

Americans for Effective Law Enforcement (AELE)
Disillusioned by the Warren Court's liberalization of criminal law, several law professors and officials in the Chicago area created the Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in 1966. Their goal was to respond "to the success the ACLU and other civil liberties groups were having" in the Supreme Court by litigating on behalf of law-abiding citizens (Epstein, 1985, pp. 92-93). Today, the AELE views itself as an apolitical organization seeking to inform the public about crime problems in the United States.

To accomplish this objective the AELE participates solely as amicus curiae in litigation, filing briefs to bolster prosecutorial arguments. As of January 1988, it had appeared as amicus curiae 81 times in the U.S. Supreme Court and 36 times in other courts. Among its most important cases are: United States v. Ross (1982), in which the Court, by adopting AELE arguments, upheld a full car search based on probable cause; Illinois v. Gates (1985) in which the justices gave law enforcement officials wide latitude to conduct searches based on anonymous tips; and U.S. v. Leon (1984), in which the Court created the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule.

In writing its amicus curiae briefs, which routinely are joined by the International Association of Police Chiefs and the National District Attorneys Association, the AELE often marshals statistical evidence and arguments presented in law review articles by staff members. In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), for example, the AELE argued that car impoundment searches conducted by police "rarely" helped them to obtain evidence. It reinforced this conclusion with a survey of 200 law enforcement agencies, which Chief Justice Burger cited in his majority opinion.

In addition to its litigation, the AELE's $519,000 budget allows it to perform an array of other activities: conducting workshops for law enforcement officials, writing model legislation, and publishing the Jail and Prison Bulletin.

FURTHER INFORMATION: Epstein, L. (1985). Conservatives in Court (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press). Ivers, G., and K. O'Connor (1987). "Friends as Foes: The Amicus Participation and Effectiveness of the Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in Criminal Cases, 1969-1982," Law & Policy 9:161-178, April.

Featured Testimonials

I love LawCrossing. I got a job by using the site. It was really easy and wonderful. It was also very easy to use.


LawCrossing Fact #36: LawCrossing features a library full of archived articles, just in case users miss a week.

Let's Do It!

Only LawCrossing consolidates every job it can find in the legal industry and puts all of the job listings it locates in one place.

  • We have more than 25 times as many legal jobs as any other job board.
  • We list jobs you will not find elsewhere that are hidden in small regional publications and employer websites.
  • We collect jobs from more than 250,000 websites and post them on our site.
  • Increase your chances of being seen! Employers on public job boards get flooded with applications. Our private job boards ensure that only members can apply to our job postings.

Success Stories

LawCrossing has the most listings of any job board I have used. It's actually a great site. The website had a lot of detail. It’s nice that you don't have to go through a recruiter if you don't want to. You can actually contact the law firm directly for the positions listed. LawCrossing had a ton of great features.
  • Brian McMillan San Francisco, CA