Anti-Abortion Protester Wins Rights to Claim Attorney Fees

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

published November 06, 2012

By Author - LawCrossing

11/06/12

Anti-abortion protester wins rights to claim attorney fees
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decisions of two lower courts that had denied the claims for attorney fees made by an anti-abortion demonstrator. The demonstrator, Steven Lefemine had won the rights to conduct his activities against challenge by the police. However, the federal judge in Greenville, South Carolina, who ruled that Lefemine had a First Amendment right to peacefully demonstrate his anti-abortion signs, had refused his claims for attorney fees. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upheld the lower court's decision.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Lefemine can obtain fees under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976, as plaintiffs who prevail on any significant issue have the rights to obtain civil rights fees. In this case, Lefemine, the antiabortion protester was the “prevailing” party without any dispute, as he had won the right to continue to exhibit the graphical antiabortion displays.

The incident that precipitated the lawsuit occurred in November 2005, when Steven Lefemine, the leader of a group called Columbia Christians for Life was protesting against abortion by displaying color photographs of mutilated fetuses at the busiest crossroads in Greenwood County, South Carolina. After several complaint calls from motorists, the police arrived and asked Lefemine to remove the signs as they were causing a traffic disturbance. Lefemine followed police instructions and removed the signs, but after two years, he sued Sheriff Dan Wideman and other officials seeking damages for violating his constitutional rights and asking for a ruling to allow him continue to display the graphic signs.
United States

The federal judge in Greenville ruled that Lefemine had a right to exercise his rights under the First Amendment and continue to display graphic anti-abortion signs, as long as he did not cause a traffic disturbance. The judge also opined that it remained on the police to see that the protesters did not move onto the street or otherwise hinder the free flow of traffic. However, the federal judge did not grant any damages, and also denied Lefemine's claims to attorney fees.

In the unsigned four-page opinion on the matter, the Supreme Court observed that Lefemine had gone to court, as he “desired to conduct demonstrations in Greenwood County with signs that the police officers told him he could not carry … After the [judge's] ruling, the police could not prevent him from demonstrating in that manner,” so there was no doubt as to Lefemine being the prevailing party in the dispute and being entitled to attorney fees. The Supreme Court has sent the case back to the federal judge to decide on attorney's fees.
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 1 vote, average: 4.3 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related