Comedy of Errors Compels Court to Unseal ‘John Doe’ Docket

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

published August 28, 2012

By Author - LawCrossing

08/28/12

Brooklyn federal judge unseals ‘John Doe’ Docket
It's a curious story of e-age media circulation and slips where a court is compelled to unseal ‘John Doe' documents, because, as the judge observes, “(T)he information the government and Doe seek to maintain sealed has already been publicly revealed; the cat is out of the bag, the genie is out of the bottle.”

On Monday, a Brooklyn federal judge, U.S. District Judge Leo Glasser, unsealed a criminal docket that was under seal for more than a decade – an effort made futile by various leaks over the year by the government and media. The judge observed that both prosecutors and the press have already identified the “John Doe” in the criminal case on several occasions, and continuing to keep his identity under seal was meaningless.

The “John Doe” in the case has been identified as one Felix Sater.

In a 1998 criminal case against Slater, he pleaded guilty to one count of racketeering in connection with a $40 million stock-fraud scheme and cooperated with the government according to terms of the plea agreement. In trying to protect Sater the case and the docket were sealed.

However, in 2010, an attorney initially identified as Richard Roe, but since then identified as one Frederick Oberlander, filed a civil racketeering case in which Sater was identified, and the complaint included several sealed documents from the criminal case. Though the civil case was sealed after a few days, the damage had already been done.

United States
This year, the Miami Herald Media Co and several members of the public filed motions for unsealing the criminal docket in public interest and questioned whether the case had been sealed legally ab initio.

While the government and lawyers on behalf of Sater argued that the case needed to be kept under wraps, the judge disagreed. Judge Glasser noted that the details of the case have been made public several times over the years.

The U.S. Attorney's Office let Sater's name and conviction slip in a press release in 2000, that was reprinted in the Congressional Record. In July, the Miami Herald ran a story identifying Sater as John Doe in the case. Earlier this year, inadvertently, the docket sheet was unsealed for several days due to an apparent clerical error.

Since the continuance of this comedy of errors made further sealing of the case and document pointless, the judge unsealed it.

The case is In re: Applications to Unseal 98-cr-1101, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 12-150.
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 3 votes, average: 3.8 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related