var googletag = googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().disableInitialLoad(); });
device = device.default;
//this function refreshes [adhesion] ad slot every 60 second and makes prebid bid on it every 60 seconds // Set timer to refresh slot every 60 seconds function setIntervalMobile() { if (!device.mobile()) return if (adhesion) setInterval(function(){ googletag.pubads().refresh([adhesion]); }, 60000); } if(device.desktop()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [728, 90], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if(device.tablet()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if(device.mobile()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } googletag.cmd.push(function() { // Enable lazy loading with... googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ // Fetch slots within 5 viewports. // fetchMarginPercent: 500, fetchMarginPercent: 100, // Render slots within 2 viewports. // renderMarginPercent: 200, renderMarginPercent: 100, // Double the above values on mobile, where viewports are smaller // and users tend to scroll faster. mobileScaling: 2.0 }); });

Fraud Charges Filed Against Former General Counsel

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

published September 17, 2007

The SEC claims that Berry's actions resulted in the two companies concealing hundreds of millions of dollars in stock option compensation expenses relating to undisclosed options for company executives and employees.

"The commission's actions confirm that attorneys are no less bound by the securities laws than other public company executives," said Linda Chatman Thomsen, the SEC's director of enforcement. "At both KLA and Juniper, Ms. Berry was in a unique position to ensure that the companies accurately disclosed their stock option expenses; instead, she facilitated their fraud on investors."

Officials for the SEC filed the complaint against Berry last month with a federal district court in San Jose, California. They allege that while Berry was working for KLA, a San Jose-based semiconductor equipment company, she regularly backdated option grants to days with historically low stock prices, after which she moved to Juniper, an information technology company based in Sunnyvale, California.

The commission alleges that Berry then established a similar process for backdating grant options, all the while creating phony documents to falsify the dates. According to EDN.com, Berry even went so far as to affix the names of other committee members with a signature stamp.

According to the Associated Press, "backdating options make the rewards even more lucrative by retroactively setting the exercise price to a low point in the stock's value. Usually, a stock option's exercise price coincides with the market value at the time of a grant to give the recipient an incentive to drive the price higher. If companies backdate options without properly disclosing and accounting for the move, it can cause profits to be overstated and taxes to be underpaid."
United States

However, according to the Associated Press, Berry disputed the charges through her attorney.

"This case is unfounded, and the SEC's allegations don't make it otherwise," Berry's attorney, Melinda Haag, said in a statement. "Lisa had no responsibility for accounting at either company, had no idea that either company violated options accounting, and did not personally benefit from misdated options grants at either company."

If found guilty, Berry, 49, of Los Gatos, California, will face unspecified civil fines and restitution as well as be barred from serving as a director or officer for any public company.
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 1 vote, average: 2.1 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Related