var googletag = googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().disableInitialLoad(); });
device = device.default;
//this function refreshes [adhesion] ad slot every 60 second and makes prebid bid on it every 60 seconds // Set timer to refresh slot every 60 seconds function setIntervalMobile() { if (! return if (adhesion) setInterval(function(){ googletag.pubads().refresh([adhesion]); }, 60000); } if(device.desktop()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [468, 60], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if(device.tablet()) { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } else if( { googletag.cmd.push(function() { leaderboard_top = googletag.defineSlot('/22018898626/LC_Article_detail_page', [320, 50], 'div-gpt-ad-1591620860846-0').setTargeting('pos', ['1']).setTargeting('div_id', ['leaderboard_top']).addService(googletag.pubads()); googletag.pubads().collapseEmptyDivs(); googletag.enableServices(); }); } googletag.cmd.push(function() { // Enable lazy loading with... googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ // Fetch slots within 5 viewports. // fetchMarginPercent: 500, fetchMarginPercent: 100, // Render slots within 2 viewports. // renderMarginPercent: 200, renderMarginPercent: 100, // Double the above values on mobile, where viewports are smaller // and users tend to scroll faster. mobileScaling: 2.0 }); });

Mike Nwogugu, Litigation Advisor and Author

( 18 votes, average: 3.9 out of 5)
What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.
Working as an in-house attorney has both pros and cons, just like any other attorney. Some of the pros include have more control on the projects you work on and having corporate benefits that other types of attorneys don't get. Some of the cons include long hours and often being required to work during weekends in order to help with legal projects in the company.

In-house attorneys enjoy various benefits that private practice attorneys don't have. That being said, there are some downsides to becoming an in-house attorney. While they often have more control over the projects they work on and receive corporate benefits, they also are often required to work long hours which can make it hard to take time off. All in all, you should definitely consider becoming an in-house attorney if it looks like the right fit for you.

  1. Why did you decide to work in a corporate governance or corporate risk management department?

    I managed the corporate governance or corporate risk management departments of companies because it was challenging and provided a mix of legal, strategy, governance and accounting issues. You get to work on a broader range of issues and transactions when working in-house in these functions - which was also a good opportunity to see the practical aspects of many of the articles and the book that I had written and published.
  2. What is the best part of working in-house in a corporate governance or corporate risk management?

    I was not an in-house lawyer, but I worked on transactions from the owners' point of view, which is very different from working as an external advisor. Issues pertaining; to risk, operations, accountability, perceived performance, effects on employee motivation and internal politics become very real when you work in-house. In-house jobs in Corporate Governance or Corporate Risk management (both of which require some legal knowledge) is usually more stable than working at consulting firms or law firms.
  3. What is the worst part of working in-house?

    There are always issues of goal congruence, and internal politics.
  4. What advice would you give to others looking to work in-house in corporate governance and or corporate risk management?

    An increasing number of lawyers are choosing to work in in-house corporate governance and or corporate risk management departments. The corporate governance and corporate risk management departments are sometimes located within the Internal Audit Group, or in the General Counsel's Group or within the CFO's group or as an independent department. It's useful to get some experience as in-house corporate governance staff or in-house attorney. It provides other opportunities for transition into other careers in finance, marketing, operations, corporate risk management and even to COO and CEO positions. The increase in regulation around the world means that more companies will need lawyers that are business savvy and operating executives that have legal backgrounds
  5. What is a typical day like for you as corporate governance or corporate risk management officer working in-house?

    It's typically busy and a mix of meetings; drafting/review of agreements, internal negotiations with senior executives; strategy sessions and accounting/financial analysis.
  6. What was your title/is your title in your prior position in-house?

    I was an Executive Vice President of Corporate Risk management and Strategic Planning (we did not have an in-house lawyer and outsourced some legal work).
  7. How does your experience compare with your peers who chose other sorts of legal jobs?

    It really depends on one's career objectives and timing. It's somewhat difficult to compare among people that have different criteria for job satisfaction, and different career objectives.

Please see this article to find out if litigation is right for you: Why Most Attorneys Have No Business Being Litigators: Fifteen Reasons Why You Should Not Be a Litigator

See In house litigation legal jobs here.

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing is a process oriented website. It is full of strong systems to provide the best to its customer.


LawCrossing Fact #109: With LawCrossing’s industry-specific, sister Crossing sites, no matter what field of work you want to pursue, we’ve got relevant jobs.

Let's Do It!

Only LawCrossing consolidates every job it can find in the legal industry and puts all of the job listings it locates in one place.

  • We have more than 25 times as many legal jobs as any other job board.
  • We list jobs you will not find elsewhere that are hidden in small regional publications and employer websites.
  • We collect jobs from more than 250,000 websites and post them on our site.
  • Increase your chances of being seen! Employers on public job boards get flooded with applications. Our private job boards ensure that only members can apply to our job postings.

Success Stories

LawCrossing has the most listings of any job board I have used. It's actually a great site. The website had a lot of detail. It’s nice that you don't have to go through a recruiter if you don't want to. You can actually contact the law firm directly for the positions listed. LawCrossing had a ton of great features.
  • Brian McMillan San Francisco, CA