U.S. Appeals Court Rules Uber Drivers Must Follow Arbitration Law, Disqualifying Class Action Lawsuits

Most law firms avoid posting jobs on Indeed or LinkedIn due to high costs. Instead, they publish them on their own websites, bar association pages, and niche legal boards. LawCrossing finds these hidden jobs, giving you access to exclusive opportunities. Sign up now!

published April 27, 2023

By Author - LawCrossing

U.S. Appeals Court Rules Uber Drivers Must Follow Arbitration Law, Disqualifying Class Action Lawsuits

On Wednesday, a U.S. appeals court based in Philadelphia ruled that Uber Technologies Inc (UBER.N) drivers must follow the U.S. law that mandates work-related legal disputes to be brought up in private arbitration instead of participating in class action lawsuits in court. The court panel stated that Uber drivers do not meet the criteria for exemption from the arbitration law, which applies to workers involved in interstate commerce, as they rarely transport passengers across state lines. A San Francisco-based appeals court reached a similar conclusion in a 2021 case concerning Uber, and a Boston appeals court ruled the same for Lyft Inc (LYFT.O) drivers that year.
 
Requests for comment from Uber and the drivers' legal representatives were only answered after the ruling. The proposed class action lawsuit claims that Uber misclassified drivers as independent contractors instead of employees, disqualifying them from receiving overtime pay and reimbursements for work-related expenses. Companies may have to pay up to 30% more for employees than contractors.

Although the Federal Arbitration Act mandates that employment-related disputes must be settled through arbitration rather than the court, workers in transportation engaged in interstate commerce are exempt. However, most private-sector U.S. workers, including most Uber drivers, have signed agreements requiring arbitration. The exemption's applicability to gig workers such as Uber drivers is critical since it determines if they can initiate class actions or must settle individual legal claims through arbitration. Individual arbitration can be challenging because of the small amounts at stake.
United States
 
According to the 3rd Circuit's findings, presented in the case, nearly 66% of Uber drivers do not transport passengers across state lines, and only 2.5% of Uber trips are interstate. Even when drivers perform interstate trips, the panel of three judges stated that it is not the core part of their job.

As Circuit Judge Anthony Scirica wrote, "If we take away interstate trips, the fundamental nature of Uber drivers' work remains unchanged." The court upheld a New Jersey federal judge's 2021 ruling that mandated the claims to be resolved through arbitration.
Gain an advantage in your legal job search. LawCrossing uncovers hidden positions that firms post on their own websites and industry-specific job boards—jobs that never appear on Indeed or LinkedIn. Don't miss out. Sign up now!

( 3 votes, average: 3.2 out of 5)

What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.