Before it even gets to court, the net neutrality rules enacted by the FCC are not nearly as strong as proponents were hoping for. The regulations lay out a tiered approach, differentiating between wired broadband service like the kind most consumers use for home and office computers and wireless service provided to mobile devices. Wireless providers are prevented under these regulations from blocking access to services in competition with services they themselves provide, but will be allowed to block or throttle non competing services, such as Skype. Wired providers face stiffer restrictions, and cannot block or throttle any legal services. However, even that restriction comes with a caveat - it's subject to ''reasonable network management'' which is left alarmingly vague. The vast majority of throttling occurs with sites that chew up huge amounts of bandwidth, such as youtube and p2p networks, and any throttling of these sites could easily be described as reasonable network management. The upshot is that even if these rules are upheld in court, they may end up doing very little to guarantee your access to the sites and services you currently enjoy, either on your wireless device or on a hard wired computer.