Are you an Employer?    Attract the Best Candidates with Smart Job Postings! Search Legal Resumes
Legal Jobs Board for Attorneys, Law Students & Legal Staff | Serving USA & Other Countries | LawCrossing

 
Job Seekers?   

Need Help? Call (800) 973-1177 
ATTORNEY JOBS
LAW STUDENT JOBS
LEGAL STAFF JOBS
Download LawCrossing Online Apps: Apple iOS
 
See Law Jobs We Have Recently Researched and Located for You
What Where
Show Recruiter Jobs  

Show Refreshed Jobs  



Search in Job Title Only
Location 
Job Type:
Employer Type:

+ Browse Legal Jobs     + Advanced Search     + Search Tips     + Upload Legal Resume
Legal Jobs >> Legal Articles >> Legal Daily News Feature >> Sidley Austin Sued For Malpractice In Rare FCPA Controversy
  • Legal Daily News Feature

Sidley Austin Sued for Malpractice in Rare FCPA Controversy



06/15/12

On June 6, in a rare action of malpractice against a law firm involving FCPA diligence, Watts Water Technologies Inc sued Sidley Austin. Watts is a public company that suffered sanctions under the FCPA and has to settle a U.S. foreign bribery case last year. And according to the records, it seems that the company is correct in suing the law firm.

Last October, Watts settled for $3.7 million in sanctions to resolve SEC allegations that its new Chinese acquisition paid bribes to Chinese government officials for bagging contracts. Watts now alleges that the fault was of the law firm which vetted the acquisition of the Chinese company in 2005.

In 2005, Sidley Austin vetted the acquisition of Changsha Valve Works and billed Watts $200,000 for due diligence. However, though records show that Sidley discovered a document detailing the written policy of Changsha Valve Works in paying kickbacks to Chinese government officials for securing contracts, the law firm did not flag the document or bring it to the notice of Watts.

In 2009, FCPA violations based on the kickback policy was noticed by the management of Watts and the company hired Paul Hastings to conduct an investigation on the kickback policy. When Sidley turned over the original due diligence files, the kickback policy was found in there. On an interview by Paul Hastings, Sidley lawyer, Zhengyu Tang admitted that the policy was a “red flag” that potentially should have been disclosed. Watts submitted in the lawsuit that had the company known about the kickback policy in 2005, it would not have made the $9 million acquisition.
Related Article
Sidley Austin LLP



Chicago-based Sidley Austin LLP is the 8th largest law firm in the world, in terms of revenue. The firm has over 1,600 attorneys and is recognized in the legal industry for its commitment to diversity and its pro bono activities. ....

Sidley Austin, LLP

Sidley Austin, LLP (formerly Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP), one of the world's largest law firms, is a legal powerhouse with several branch offices spanning the globe. The firm has offices in Beijing, Brussels, Chicago, Dallas, Frankfurt, Geneva, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, S ....

Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood LLP

Recently rated by American Law Journal as the nation's top corporate firm, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood is a preeminent domestic firm with a strong international presence. ....

The lawsuit, once again raises the issue of confusion over the application of the FCPA. Business groups across the country including the Chamber of Commerce are already running campaigns to amend the law, alleging that there was a lack of clarity that killed business. This lawsuit proves the case of business groups where a company had to shell out millions of dollars over conduct which even one of the best law firms could not detect by due diligence.

The FCPA does not only make companies and their overseas employees accountable, but also liable for the conduct of acquired companies. According to business groups, this kills growth and international expansion of American companies.
The case is Watts Water Technologies, Inc. v. Sidley Austin LLP, Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 0004847-12.
Share      
     
Rate This Article
   View top rated articles

Printable Version    Printable Version PDF Version    PDF Version Email to a Friend    Email to a Friend
Comment    Post A Comment View Comment    View Comment Discuss    Discuss

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing is a very informative and convenient to use website. It is the best I have ever visited!
Steven

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #107: Our site is cool. Its design is sleek and sophisticated.

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!"

Comments


Article ID: 7845    

Article Title: Sidley Austin Sued for Malpractice in Rare FCPA Controversy

Comment not found for this article.

Comment Comment

Facebook comments:


total jobs
95,786
Upload Your Resume
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
13,884
Facebook Twitter
job search tip
Learn to toot your own horn. Time yourself five minutes and write down every compliment you've received on the job, formal (performance appraisal) or informal. (You'll be surprised how terrific you really are!)
LawCrossing



The Job Search Program that Guarantees Success.
Our career counselor creates a tailor-made job search strategy for you and walks you through every step of the process.
Create your unique brand for just $2,495!
2013 Most Influential Legal Recruiter Rankings
Get the ranking

Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.




Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.