Weber Olcese, PLC

What would you, or others, like to see changed at employer?
This review is being submitted based on Attorney Michael J. Olcese’s conduct in a landlord-tenant dispute where he represented the defendant. Mr. Olcese’s involvement in the case raised serious concerns about professional ethics and legal integrity. During the course of litigation, he threatened to file a counterclaim alleging improper pet fees related to an emotional support animal—despite acknowledging in writing that the claim lacked merit. His email stated, “I did not expect you to find the countersuit to be valid, but your client's court costs will be a lot higher if we proceed that way…” This appears to be a deliberate attempt to pressure a settlement by threatening frivolous litigation solely to inflate our legal expenses. Additionally, we have reason to believe that Mr. Olcese may have a personal relationship with the defendant and that his legal services were provided without compensation, raising further ethical questions. In our view, this conduct reflects a troubling disregard for professional standards and the responsible practice of law. We have formally requested that the appropriate disciplinary authority review this matter and consider sanctions. Based on our experience, we believe Mr. Olcese’s continued licensure may pose a risk to the public. We strongly encourage others to avoid legal representation by Mr. Olcese.

What were the things that you liked most about this employer?
This review is being submitted based on Attorney Michael J. Olcese’s conduct in a landlord-tenant dispute where he represented the defendant. Mr. Olcese’s involvement in the case raised serious concerns about professional ethics and legal integrity. During the course of litigation, he threatened to file a counterclaim alleging improper pet fees related to an emotional support animal—despite acknowledging in writing that the claim lacked merit. His email stated, “I did not expect you to find the countersuit to be valid, but your client's court costs will be a lot higher if we proceed that way…” This appears to be a deliberate attempt to pressure a settlement by threatening frivolous litigation solely to inflate our legal expenses. Additionally, we have reason to believe that Mr. Olcese may have a personal relationship with the defendant and that his legal services were provided without compensation, raising further ethical questions. In our view, this conduct reflects a troubling disregard for professional standards and the responsible practice of law. We have formally requested that the appropriate disciplinary authority review this matter and consider sanctions. Based on our experience, we believe Mr. Olcese’s continued licensure may pose a risk to the public. We strongly encourage others to avoid legal representation by Mr. Olcese.

What did you not like about this institution?
This review is being submitted based on Attorney Michael J. Olcese’s conduct in a landlord-tenant dispute where he represented the defendant. Mr. Olcese’s involvement in the case raised serious concerns about professional ethics and legal integrity. During the course of litigation, he threatened to file a counterclaim alleging improper pet fees related to an emotional support animal—despite acknowledging in writing that the claim lacked merit. His email stated, “I did not expect you to find the countersuit to be valid, but your client's court costs will be a lot higher if we proceed that way…” This appears to be a deliberate attempt to pressure a settlement by threatening frivolous litigation solely to inflate our legal expenses. Additionally, we have reason to believe that Mr. Olcese may have a personal relationship with the defendant and that his legal services were provided without compensation, raising further ethical questions. In our view, this conduct reflects a troubling disregard for professional standards and the responsible practice of law. We have formally requested that the appropriate disciplinary authority review this matter and consider sanctions. Based on our experience, we believe Mr. Olcese’s continued licensure may pose a risk to the public. We strongly encourage others to avoid legal representation by Mr. Olcese.

People, departments, offices, products, services and whatever comes to mind that should be avoided at this institution
This review is being submitted based on Attorney Michael J. Olcese’s conduct in a landlord-tenant dispute where he represented the defendant. Mr. Olcese’s involvement in the case raised serious concerns about professional ethics and legal integrity. During the course of litigation, he threatened to file a counterclaim alleging improper pet fees related to an emotional support animal—despite acknowledging in writing that the claim lacked merit. His email stated, “I did not expect you to find the countersuit to be valid, but your client's court costs will be a lot higher if we proceed that way…” This appears to be a deliberate attempt to pressure a settlement by threatening frivolous litigation solely to inflate our legal expenses. Additionally, we have reason to believe that Mr. Olcese may have a personal relationship with the defendant and that his legal services were provided without compensation, raising further ethical questions. In our view, this conduct reflects a troubling disregard for professional standards and the responsible practice of law. We have formally requested that the appropriate disciplinary authority review this matter and consider sanctions. Based on our experience, we believe Mr. Olcese’s continued licensure may pose a risk to the public. We strongly encourage others to avoid legal representation by Mr. Olcese.

How could this employer run its business to employees or the public better?
This review is being submitted based on Attorney Michael J. Olcese’s conduct in a landlord-tenant dispute where he represented the defendant. Mr. Olcese’s involvement in the case raised serious concerns about professional ethics and legal integrity. During the course of litigation, he threatened to file a counterclaim alleging improper pet fees related to an emotional support animal—despite acknowledging in writing that the claim lacked merit. His email stated, “I did not expect you to find the countersuit to be valid, but your client's court costs will be a lot higher if we proceed that way…” This appears to be a deliberate attempt to pressure a settlement by threatening frivolous litigation solely to inflate our legal expenses. Additionally, we have reason to believe that Mr. Olcese may have a personal relationship with the defendant and that his legal services were provided without compensation, raising further ethical questions. In our view, this conduct reflects a troubling disregard for professional standards and the responsible practice of law. We have formally requested that the appropriate disciplinary authority review this matter and consider sanctions. Based on our experience, we believe Mr. Olcese’s continued licensure may pose a risk to the public. We strongly encourage others to avoid legal representation by Mr. Olcese.

What would you, or others, like to see changed at employer?
More professional development and a better work environment would reduce turnover, as would increasing employee pay.

What were the things that you liked most about this employer?
The work is steady and there's always more coming in since debt collection is constant legal problem. They are open to hiring you without a ton of experience

What did you not like about this institution?
Work environment is more cutthroat than it should be and leads to people quitting fairly often. Pay should be more competitive.

Career Opportunities:

Compensation & Benefits:

Work/Life Balance:

Senior Management:

Culture & Values:

Length of Employment:
10+ years