By now, in 2013, and with law firms changing their natures of practice and of doing things, almost everyone in the profession is aware about terms like e-document review, or eLawyering, and online interactivity. However, what many lawyers fail to assess, beyond visualizing a gradual loss of demand in services, is how to adapt to remain relevant in an era of information technology assailing the legal world. Where do things begin and where do they end?
Well, the end is always difficult to foretell, but one can safely assume that things begin with an understanding of learning how to practice law using virtual workplaces and remote interaction, and the end lies in creating your own subject-expertise system. Is that beneficial? Ask the law firms, they are already half there.
Virtual workplaces and virtual interaction systems for lawyers
Most lawyers are already into virtual interaction without defining it as such. Video conferencing, online chatting, and even phone calls are included in virtual interaction, as the interacting parties are not physically collocated within the same physical space. Lawyers have already been doing it for years. However, most have been doing it in a personalized one-to-one fashion. Creating subject-expert systems takes things forward to their natural end, where lawyers start delegating things to software, rather than to associates, and employ humans to work that requires direct human attention.
What is a subject-expert system?
Though there is no one definition or approach to creating a subject expert system, it might be said that it is a software system that stores your subject expertise in a conversational and query-able form that can be easily accessed by you, and parts of which are client-specific and can be easily accessed by clients.
Subject expert systems in the legal profession can start with query systems that are very similar to the online survey or submission forms that you see regularly in different websites. Currently, in traditional work formats, actual human hours are wasted in asking people to fill up forms, or asking questions to clients that can be done better by interactive software. It saves time and money for both the client and the lawyer to have an online system that, like a step-by-step software wizard, leads a client through logical sets of questions and gleans out a sum of data in presentable format that enhances the workflow.
Individually, and acting only through physical collocation and human interaction, the amount of service rendered or potential clients interviewed is limited by the constraints of time, space, and number of humans. The same interview transferred online to a query system leads to a multiplication of capacity that is endless. Maybe you and your associates can interview thirty clients a day, but with an online subject expert system in place, conducting the same interview with three million clients a day is not inconceivable.
I would like to quote David R. Johnson
from his essay “Serving Justice with Conversational Law
” (The Futurist, September-October 2012) here. Johnson emphasizes the point saying, “A legal-expert system … created and maintained by a lawyer, … can be used at any time by many more customers than could possibly consult with that lawyer in person. It can produce profits sufficient to compensate the lawyer for creating the work, even if the fee charged to an individual is quite modest.”
It is self-evident that the lower cost of accessing an online system for personalized legal advice (and by costs read, money, time, fuel, priorities and an endless number of other concerns) radically reduces demands for personal meetings (something that benefits both lawyers and clients when it comes to costs).
So, what's the takeaway for my career?
Johnson says, “Building a legal-expert system is a highly skilled form of law practice … It requires thinking through all of the many different types of factual situations that might cause an expert lawyer, if she were meeting with a client in person, to subtly alter her advice. It requires the highest quality of writing to ensure that both the questions asked during the automated conversation and the advice given are understood. Software economics enables a system to reach many customers at low marginal cost, so it could become a well-compensated career path for a lawyer.”
It's already the reality for law firms with companies offering logic systems that help law firms to build their own subject-expert systems, and it's only a step away for individual lawyers to do the same. Adapt and overcome.
LawCrossing has received tens of thousands of attorneys
jobs and has been the leading legal job board in the United States for almost two decades. LawCrossing helps attorneys dramatically improve their careers by locating every legal job opening in the market. Unlike other job sites, LawCrossing consolidates every job in the legal market and posts jobs regardless of whether or not an employer is paying. LawCrossing takes your legal career seriously and understands the legal profession. For more information, please visit www.LawCrossing.com.
The jobs listed on LawCrossing had complete details about the company as well as the job which is very very helpful!
LawCrossing Fact #197: LawCrossing lists opportunities ranging from entry-level jobs to executive-level positions.
Harrison Barnes does a weekly free webinar with live Q&A for attorneys and law students each Wednesday at 10:00 am PST. You can attend anonymously and ask questions about your career, this article, or any other legal career-related topics. You can sign up for the weekly webinar here: Register on Zoom
Harrison also does a weekly free webinar with live Q&A for law firms, companies, and others who hire attorneys each Wednesday at 10:00 am PST. You can sign up for the weekly webinar here: Register on Zoom
You can browse a list of past webinars here: Webinar Replays
You can also listen to Harrison Barnes Podcasts here: Attorney Career Advice Podcasts
You can also read Harrison Barnes' articles and books here: Harrison's Perspectives
Harrison Barnes is the legal profession's mentor and may be the only person in your legal career who will tell you why you are not reaching your full potential and what you really need to do to grow as an attorney--regardless of how much it hurts. If you prefer truth to stagnation, growth to comfort, and actionable ideas instead of fluffy concepts, you and Harrison will get along just fine. If, however, you want to stay where you are, talk about your past successes, and feel comfortable, Harrison is not for you.
Truly great mentors are like parents, doctors, therapists, spiritual figures, and others because in order to help you they need to expose you to pain and expose your weaknesses. But suppose you act on the advice and pain created by a mentor. In that case, you will become better: a better attorney, better employees, a better boss, know where you are going, and appreciate where you have been--you will hopefully also become a happier and better person. As you learn from Harrison, he hopes he will become your mentor.
To read more career and life advice articles visit Harrison's personal blog.