Support PDF,DOC,DOCX,TXT,XLS,WPD,HTM,HTML fils up to 5MB
Gender Pay Gap
by Ashley Caggiano
( 3 votes, average: 3.8 out of 5)
What do you think about this article? Rate it using the stars above and let us know what you think in the comments below.
According to research done at Temple University and the University of Texas-Pan American by law and business professors, female lawyers actually outperform male lawyers, yet women lawyers are consistently earning less. The study compiled a research sample from the 200 largest law firms by revenue in the United States between 2002 and 2007 using the standards of The National Law Journal affiliate The American Lawyer. The study ultimately found that ''If these women are underpaid and undervalued in terms of rank despite their conformity to a lockstep pattern, the inequalities could be due to intentional discrimination."
Maria Angel, Temple law professor, had been studying similar patterns at Pennsylvania law firms. Angel found that revenue per lawyer remained the same at firms with high percentages of women attorneys compared to those with low percentages of female attorneys. She was well aware of the often touted belief that women earn less because they work fewer hours or are not rainmakers. But, in fact, the study found that ''Even if women do not devote as much time to their careers due to caretaking duties, there is no evidence of it adversely impacting their revenue generating ability.'' If the suggestion that women are less productive is discredited, then gender discrimination is a more likely explanation for the gap in pay.
Angel predicts the gap will grow, even with attention drawn to the issue, because firms are foregoing entry-level hiring in favor of established laterals. A larger percentage of entry-level hires are women whereas established laterals are more likely to be older males.
The lockstep system may be considered another source of the pay gap. Basing pay on seniority is harmful to women who take time off to have children or be a caretaker as they are often excluded from opportunities for promotions and not considered for partner. However, Angel says that even women who have not taken time off are still consistently earning less than men.
''Firms can no longer bury their heads in the sand and come up with excuses,'' says Angel. ''They are simply going to have to address the problems in their higher ranks.''
Maria Angel, Temple law professor, had been studying similar patterns at Pennsylvania law firms. Angel found that revenue per lawyer remained the same at firms with high percentages of women attorneys compared to those with low percentages of female attorneys. She was well aware of the often touted belief that women earn less because they work fewer hours or are not rainmakers. But, in fact, the study found that ''Even if women do not devote as much time to their careers due to caretaking duties, there is no evidence of it adversely impacting their revenue generating ability.'' If the suggestion that women are less productive is discredited, then gender discrimination is a more likely explanation for the gap in pay.
Angel predicts the gap will grow, even with attention drawn to the issue, because firms are foregoing entry-level hiring in favor of established laterals. A larger percentage of entry-level hires are women whereas established laterals are more likely to be older males.
The lockstep system may be considered another source of the pay gap. Basing pay on seniority is harmful to women who take time off to have children or be a caretaker as they are often excluded from opportunities for promotions and not considered for partner. However, Angel says that even women who have not taken time off are still consistently earning less than men.
''Firms can no longer bury their heads in the sand and come up with excuses,'' says Angel. ''They are simply going to have to address the problems in their higher ranks.''
Article Category
The University of Texas-Pan American

Featured Testimonials
A job search can be a really frustrating experience. LawCrossing makes it a breeze.
Matthew
Facts
LawCrossing Fact #200: Recruiters use LawCrossing because they can find more opportunities for their clients; you can be your own recruiter!
Success Stories
- Ann Harris Harvey, LA
Why You'll Love LawCrossing
Legal Job Market Updates
Stay Ahead. Get your weekly career digest giving you:
- the latest legal jobs
- legal employment news and trends
- career advice and more
Questions?
- What is LawCrossing?
- Who Else Is Ready to Never Have to Worry About Recessions and the Legal Job Market Again?
- Why Job Boards Are Evil!
- Blow Away Your Competition with LawCrossing
- Get More Employers to Respond to Your Applications and Hire You
- Why You Are Not Aware of 95% of the Jobs Out There
- Why LawCrossing's Marketing Problem is Good for You
- Why It is Important to See Every Job Site There is
- Private versus Public Job Boards
- Why You Need to Manage Your Job Search in One Place
- Who Else Wants Their Phone Ringing Off the Hook With Quality Job Interviews?
- Do Not Use Another Job Board Until You Read This

Already have access? Click here to login | Forgot your password
Sign up now for free access to this content
Enter your details below and select your practice area(s) of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Lawcrossing search daily newsletters.