Use IRAC in Your Law Exam Answers

Answering law school exam essay questions is a specialized skill. Your objectives in answering essay questions are:
  1. Identify the legal issues.

  2. State the legal rules applicable to those issues.

  3. Discuss the application of the rules to the facts presented in the questions.

  4. State a conclusion as to the proper resolution of the issues.
(The common acronym for this method is IRAC, taken from the key italicized words from each step.) Identifying the legal issues is half the battle. Most of the time, the issues that appear on the final examination will be issues that were discussed in class, which is an important reason to attend class regularly.

The legal rules must be memorized. This is what is known as black letter law, and it is readily available to you from sources previously discussed. Creating a course outline from your class notes, briefs, commercial course outlines, and an occasional reference to hornbooks will give you a good grasp of the black letter law. You need to know the black letter law and be able to state it clearly and correctly in your answer in order to pass a final examination. Additionally, knowing the black letter law enables you to identify pertinent legal issues.

Discussing the application of the black letter law to the facts presented by the examination question is fairly straightforward and should flow naturally (but not mechanically) from the statement of the legal rule. For example, a torts examination answer discussing negligence issues arising in the context of an automobile accident might read in part as follows:

Plaintiffs Comparative Negligence Regarding the Auto Accident

An important issue is whether plaintiff's own conduct will legally bar him from recovery in whole or in part. The doctrine of comparative negligence operates to reduce a Plaintiff's recovery in the proportion to the degree to which Plaintiffs own negligence contributes to his injuries. Additionally, in some jurisdictions if the negligence attributable to a Plaintiff contributed more than fifty percent to his own injuries, Plaintiff will be barred from recovering anything. Plaintiffs conduct will be held negligent if it fell below the standard of reasonable care-what a reasonably prudent person would have done in the same circumstances.

Here, Plaintiff was intoxicated and exceeding the posted speed limit by thirty-five miles per hour at the time his vehicle collided with Defendant s truck stalled on the highway. Plaintiffs conduct thus fell below the standard of reasonable care in two respects-in driving while intoxicated and in substantially exceeding the speed limit. Plaintiffs negligent conduct was a but-for cause of the accident because had he not been intoxicated and speeding, he probably could have reacted in time to avoid the accident. Plaintiff's conduct was also a proximate, or legal, cause of the accident, since it was very near in time and place to the accident, and it was reasonably foreseeable that speeding while intoxicated would hamper one's ability to safely negotiate unexpected obstacles, which frequently appear in the road, such as stalled vehicles. For these reasons, even if Defendant were also negligent to some degree in failing to anticipate the mechanical problem with his truck, Plaintiff's conduct was overwhelmingly responsible (more than fifty percent) for causing the accident. Therefore, Plaintiff probably would be barred from recovering anything for his injuries from Defendant, or in any event his recovery would be substantially reduced.

The conclusion usually is the least important part of an essay answer. While in some code- or rule-based courses, only one conclusion can properly be drawn under the rules, the majority of essay questions provide plenty of room to argue both sides of an issue. In fact, professors usually present 'gray area" issues on exams that could go either way. They are looking for analysis and argument rather than a single correct answer. Therefore, your conclusion will be far less important than how you arrived at it.

While the IRAC method works fine for most law school essay exams, this is not always the case. In some classes, particularly those dealing with constitutional law, your professor may write an exam that raises issues that are not covered by any existing legal principles or black letter law. When faced with such a test, you should state the legal principles that come closest to addressing the issues on the exam. You also should discuss which (if any) of these principles should govern the matter at hand. You may, for example, want to reason by analogy that an established principle governs the hypothetical, or that public policy precludes its application. Further, your analysis should include a discussion of whether the rationale behind the rule or principle in question would be served if it is applied to the given facts. You could also consider proposing an entirely new principle of law to fit the specific facts on the exam. Such a principle should be based on logic, equity, public policy, and common sense.

No matter how you go about answering an exam question, use complete sentences. Avoid fragments or terse, mechanical expositions of the issues, rules, and applications. Remember that professors will be judging you against your classmates based on writing ability as well as substantive knowledge-both are very important. Note that the preceding sample answer makes good use of headings and underlining to organize and emphasize its points in a logical and clear manner. Your law professor will appreciate your use of such techniques provided they are not overdone.

Featured Testimonials

The articles and the number of the jobs listed on LawCrossing are awesome!


LawCrossing Fact #217: LawCrossing is a revolutionary multimillion-dollar job research tool unlike any other.

Denver, CO
Legal Secretary The candidate reports directly to Office Administrator on administrative matters. R...
Apply now  
Los Angeles, CA
Litigation Legal Secretary The candidate should have 5+ years of strong Litigation Secretarial expe...
Apply now  
Orlando, FL
Litigation Legal Secretary The candidate must have 3+ years of experience in a law firm setting. Sh...
Apply now  
Chicago, IL
Legal Secretary The candidate should have previous experience with litigation, medical /malpractice...
Apply now  
Louisville, KY
Legal Secretary / Receptionist The candidate: Must have 2+ years' experience in a law firm settin...
Apply now  
Florham Park, NJ
Legal Secretary The candidate should have 5+ years of experience. Must have excellent organizationa...
Apply now  



Testimonial of the Week

Out of all the other job boards I have used, LawCrossing was definitely the most impressive. I have received many job interviews from jobs I applied to on your site.
  • Mark Herskovitz Los Angeles, CA
Job of the Day

Real Estate / Finance Associate

New York City, NY

    We are searching for a real estate / finance associate, mid-level, to join a large firm's New York office.  The ...

Employer: R. Singer Search LLC

Job Search Tip

Recruiters care about two things-credentials and personality. Can you do the job based on past performance and will you fit in with the corporate culture?