On Tuesday, New Jersey Supreme Court justices ruled that last year's state pension reform does not apply to them. The reform had required judges and justices to increase healthcare and pension contributions. In a split decision, the court found that the pension reform violates the New Jersey Constitution.
However, State Senate President Steve Sweeney said that he was disappointed, and the Democrat warned that this “will not be the final word on this issue.” Sweeney further said, “The reforms we passed last year are essential to ensuring the health and viability of every one of the state's pension systems.”
Sweeney's sentiments were echoed by the state Senate's Republican leader, Tom Keane Jr. Mr. Keane said, “Judges should not be insulated from economic reality by a dubious claim that paying their fair share for the richest benefits in the state government is an impediment to judicial independence.”
In June 2011, New Jersey had enacted Chapter 78, which introduced changes to the underfunded retirement benefits of public employees, including that of the state's sitting judges and justices. However, the New Jersey constitution is clear on the point and declares that salaries of judges “shall not be diminished during the term of their appointment.”
It was learned last week that Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, New Jersey, has formed a 17-member panel to review New York’s pro bono mandate and make recommendations to Rabner on creating a similar requirement in New Jersey. The committee, chaired by Judge Glenn Grant, the acting administrative director of New ....
Since 1963 New Jersey hasn't executed an inmate on death row. And with a new bill likely to be signed into action in the near future, no one will ever face the possibility of execution in the state again. ....
When a person is involved in getting a divorce, they of course retain a lawyer. A lawyer is absolutely needed for some aspects of a divorce such as making sure the right paper work is filled out in the right way. This is true not just for divorce, but also for some other legal disputes, too, although divorce ....
The new pension rules had required judges to increase their pension contributions from the current 3 percent to 12 percent over a period of seven years. Besides increasing pension contributions, judges were also required to more than double their healthcare contributions resulting in a neat reduction of $17,000 in take home salaries.
The opinion also mentioned that protecting the salaries of judges from cuts imposed by other branches of the government was required to “prevent those branches from placing a chokehold on the livelihood of jurists who might be required to oppose their actions.”
The decision was 3-2, with the two dissenting judges holding that the majority decision was not supported by either the constitution or the intention of the lawmakers who framed the constitution.
However, a judge hired in New Jersey after Chapter 78 was duly passed, would come under its ambit and has to make enhanced pension and healthcare contributions according to the new law.
LawCrossing has the most number of legal job listings. You can find a job at any corner of the world on LawCrossing. Jillian
Facts
LawCrossing Fact #175: Our customer support offers you diligent advice and information to meet your job-search needs.
Facebook comments:
total jobs
95,250
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
9,358
job search tip
Don't use Thank-You' stationery or stationery with business letterheads. And never send humorous cards.'
The Job Search Program that Guarantees Success.
Our career counselor creates a tailor-made job search strategy for you and walks you through every step of the process.
However, State Senate President Steve Sweeney said that he was disappointed, and the Democrat warned that this “will not be the final word on this issue.” Sweeney further said, “The reforms we passed last year are essential to ensuring the health and viability of every one of the state's pension systems.”
