Are you an Employer?    Attract the Best Candidates with Smart Job Postings! Search Legal Resumes
Legal Jobs Board for Attorneys, Law Students & Legal Staff | Serving USA & Other Countries | LawCrossing

 
Job Seekers?   

Need Help? Call (800) 973-1177 
ATTORNEY JOBS
LAW STUDENT JOBS
LEGAL STAFF JOBS
Download LawCrossing Online Apps: Apple iOS
 
See Law Jobs We Have Recently Researched and Located for You
What Where
Show Recruiter Jobs  

Show Refreshed Jobs  



Search in Job Title Only
Location 
Job Type:
Employer Type:

+ Browse Legal Jobs     + Advanced Search     + Search Tips     + Upload Legal Resume
Legal Jobs >> Legal Articles >> Feature >> Study At Law School Is An “Investment” Not A ''Consumer Purchase''
  • Feature

Study at Law School is an “Investment” not a ''Consumer Purchase''



On July 20, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan Southern Division dismissed a lawsuit brought against Cooley Law School by 12 former students and graduates. While many of the law graduates were meaningfully employed in the legal arena, and some had their solo or small law firm practices, some had fared so poorly that they deemed it inequitable, given the representations the law school made to incoming students.

Why the dismissal of the case against Cooley Law is important


Why the lawsuit against Cooley Law School was dismissedThis case, in general, reflects the grievances of law graduates who have failed to find positions aligned with their ambitions. And this is why it is important to learn the weaknesses the court found in the arguments of the former students against their law school.

The court papers of the judgment in Case 1:11-cv-00831-GJQ Doc #54 Filed 07/20/12 Page 6 of 22 Page ID#962 mentions “Shane Hobbs has worked as substitute teacher and day laborer at a golf course since graduation. Danny Wakefield manages the deliveries of telephone books. Steve Baron is unemployed.” Without contradiction, these are quite unacceptable futures for persons holding a JD from an accredited law school.

However, the dismissal of the case by former graduates against their law school also shows the stand of the law and why, the decision to borrow or spend money for an education at a law school is seen as an investment and not as a consumer purchase amenable to the protection of consumer rights. Though Cooley Law's case concerned the consumer protection law in Michigan, a similar lawsuit in New York had also been dismissed earlier on similar causes and reasoning.
Related Article
Thomas M. Cooley Law School

If you subscribe to the adage ''bigger is better,'' then Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, MI, may be the perfect place for you. Cooley boasts the largest J.D. law school program in the nation (and the second-largest overall law school), giving it a diversity among students and faculty and a breadth in ....

Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Established in 1972, the Thomas M. Cooley Law School is located in Lansing, Michigan with satellite offices in Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Auburn Hills. This prestigious institution is home to former governors and politicians and is considered if not the most diverse law school in the country, then certainly ....

The Life and Career of Jayashri Srikantiah; Director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic and Associate Professor of Law, Stanford Law School

The Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Stanford Law School has been helping both student attorneys and immigrant clients since it started in 2004. LawCrossing speaks with the clinic's director, Jayashri Srikantiah, about her career and how she went about building the program. ....

The grievances the former students of Cooley Law placed before the court


The dismissal order of the case made by the former students of Cooley Law mentions:
“Plaintiffs allege that “Cooley is primarily marketing its product to naïve, relatively unsophisticated consumers – many of whom are barely removed from college – who are often making their first ‘big-ticket' purchase.” In turn, Cooley's alleged misrepresentations led Plaintiffs to take on tens of thousands of dollars in debt so that they could attend Cooley. … According to the complaint, in 2009, twice as many people passed the bar as there were job openings. In addition, the national median salary for recent graduates has declined a great amount.”
In essence, the above grievances sum up all general grievances that any unsuccessful law graduate might possess against his/her law school.

The court's reasoning in denying the protection of Michigan Consumer Protection Law in the case

Barring the citations and mentions of stare decisis the following passage sums up the reasoning of the court in dismissing the claims of the former law students of Cooley Law:
“Plaintiffs did not purchase a Cooley legal education so that they could leisurely read and understand Supreme Court Reports, or to provide legal services for themselves or family members. Rather, Plaintiffs purchased a legal education in order to make money as lawyers so that they could live a lifestyle that they believed (perhaps naively) would be more pleasing to them. This is a business purpose. Of course, making more money can lead to happiness, or not. … but this would not change the fundamental purpose of the purchase – “primarily for business or commercial.” Plaintiffs “intended” their legal employment to subsequently better their personal circumstances, these better “personal circumstances” would be attained through their work as lawyers, i.e. a business. See Baptichon v. Thomas M. Cooley Law Sch., No. 1:09-cv-562, 2009 WL 5214911, at *6-*7 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 28, 2009) (finding, in an action by a former Cooley student against Cooley, that the “Plaintiff attended Cooley (i.e., purchased its services) so that he could obtain work and start his own business,” and therefore, the MCPA did not apply because the plaintiff purchased the services for a business or commercial purpose). Likewise, this Court holds that the Complaint does not allege a claim under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act.”
The court also denied other counts alleging fraud and misrepresentation in employment data, but that is not the subject of this article. There have been a number of law suits filed against law schools for misrepresenting employment data by former students, but essentially all those complaints boil down to whether the law students have any legal right upon which they can successfully challenge that they had been misled and thus have a cause of action. The rights of a consumer have been claimed in almost all of these lawsuits filed by former law students against law schools. As decisions over such lawsuits start, we find that courts are also following similar reasoning in dismissing such lawsuits and holding law school education as an investment for future gain, and not to be confused with a consumer purchase where the marketer can be sued for misrepresentation.
Share      
     
Rate This Article
   View top rated articles

Printable Version    Printable Version PDF Version    PDF Version Email to a Friend    Email to a Friend
Comment    Post A Comment View Comment    View Comment Discuss    Discuss

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing does not need any improvement and I had a wonderful time with it. It also added a lot to my knowledge.
Ina

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #27: LawCrossing monitors more than 250,000 websites -- and counting -- on a daily basis to add to our selection of jobs.

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!"

Comments


Article ID: 7969    

Article Title: Study at Law School is an “Investment” not a ''Consumer Purchase''

Comment not found for this article.

Comment Comment

Facebook comments:


total jobs
95,162
Upload Your Resume
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
10,352
Facebook Twitter
job search tip
Check your posture, eye contact, energy level. Evaluate your voice. Is it high and screeching? Are your answers punctuated with a lot of er's' and 'urn's'?'
LawCrossing



The Job Search Program that Guarantees Success.
Our career counselor creates a tailor-made job search strategy for you and walks you through every step of the process.
Create your unique brand for just $2,495!
2013 Most Influential Legal Recruiter Rankings
Get the ranking

Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.




Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.