Theresa Voge, Misquoted by the Delphic Times

10 Views
The article is entitled ''Supreme Court Justice Alito delivers Opperman Lecture''.

In the blog posted at the Times Delphic website, Ms. Voge explains she was approached by who she assumed was the staff writer for the piece, a Ms. Robinson. She asked Ms. Voge to give her opinions and thoughts as a law student.



She goes on to explain that she was more than happy to do so and thought that Ms. Robinson asked some incredibly insightful questions.

Unfortunately, Ms. Voge found, upon reading the article, that she'd been misquoted. The article stated that Ms. Voge had said: ''We, as law students, learn and study how history, precedent and case law are important in decision making, and it carries over to the Supreme Court.''

Voge describes this statement as ‘woefully inaccurate in terms of its substance'.

This quote, per Voge, was her answer to the question, what had she learned from Justice Alito's lecture?

To clarify what she'd actually said, Ms. Voge states that law school ''teaches us the importance of history, precedent and case law.'' Additionally she learned ''the Supreme Court relies on these things not only in their decision making but also in their procedural decisions, particularly regarding the importance and role of oral argument in the current Supreme Court.''

Per Ms. Voge, she states this was the context of her answer and the source of her quotation. She also states the quote in the article was ripped out of that context and, as it is, is severely lacking in its true substance.

She continues, stating that ''by being taken out of the necessary context, the quote itself is inaccurate in its information because ''history, precedent and case law'' do not ''carry over to the Supreme Court''-the practice of using case law as precedent was established by the Supreme Court and ''carries over'' to the practice of law.''

Voge suggests the Delphic Times writers strive for accuracy, and that they keep the quote given in the true context in which it was given. She thanks her readers for their time.


Featured Testimonials

I have used every aspect of LawCrossing and concluded that the website is awesome. Jobs are described in a perfect way.
Lorraine


Facts

LawCrossing Fact #228: We offer a live support feature that allows you to chat live with a member of the LawCrossing team if you ever have any questions.


Location
Anchorage, AK
Description
Temporary Coal Ash Project Attorney The candidate will join a team of lawyers and advocates who are...
Apply now  
Location
Nome, AK
Description
Deputy Clerk II (41-2008) Duties : Answer and route telephone calls; answer questions from the publ...
Apply now  
Location
Nome, AK
Description
Deputy Clerk II Duties: The candidate will perform a variety of clerical and technical functions in...
Apply now  
Location
Birmingham, AL
Description
Seeking a Tax Attorney with 10+ years of experience. The candidate must have an LLM in taxation and ...
Apply now  
Location
Birmingham, AL
Description
Seeking Tax Attorney with 10+ years of experience. The candidate must have expertise in transactiona...
Apply now  
Location
Birmingham, AL
Description
Attorney Duties: Responsible for providing legal services and counseling with respect to a wide r...
Apply now  
 

NOW TRENDING ON BCG ATTORNEY SEARCH

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Testimonial of the Week

LawCrossing has the most listings of any job board I have used. It's actually a great site. The website had a lot of detail. It’s nice that you don't have to go through a recruiter if you don't want to. You can actually contact the law firm directly for the positions listed. LawCrossing had a ton of great features.
  • Brian McMillan San Francisco, CA
Job of the Day

Partner / Attorney- $400K Portables

San Francisco, CA

A national full-service law firm is adding partners for a variety of practice areas (litigation, intellectual property, ...

Employer: Continuum Legal

Job Search Tip

Is self-employment for you?