10-23-08 Today, nearly two years later, Judge Pauley has approved the class action suit, Park v. Thomson Corp. The suit was approved after finding that BAR/BRI was indeed in violation of antitrust laws. Anthony Park, the plaintiff, claimed the company's dominant position in state law courses forced him to purchase the multistate course as well. The Thomson Corporation was represented by Steven F. Molo of Shearman & Sterling, a 130 year old organization with offices around the world. Thompson Corp., the Canadian conglomerate who is the BAR/BRI parent company, agreed to settle the suit for $13 million. The judge also said the settlement requires "Thomson to untie the state-specific and multistate portions of their courses for three years." This requirement is expected to help other competitors in the law review industry gain a more substantial chunk of the market. The article also stated that "between 80 percent and 90 percent of those who take a bar preparatory course, or around 40,000 lawyers and students a year, take one offered by BAR/BRI." Also noteworthy in the settlement, is that Judge Pauley denied the Park plaintiffs lawyers their requested 24 percent contingent fee, roughly 3.1 million, and instead cut the amount to a 16 percent contingent fee, or approximately 2.1 million. In recent years, several comparable courses have been filed against the law review giant, including a $49 million settlement in a California antitrust case, Rodriguez v. West Publishing Co. The million dollar cut was based on the Rodriguez v. West Publishing Co. ruling because Judge Pauley believed it reduced risk in the decision. He also noted that the Rodriguez lawyers asked for a 1.75 multiplier, while the Park legal team requested to apply a 2.32 multiplier. In turn, the plaintiff attorneys received a 1.5 multiplier. The Park plaintiffs were represented by The Katriel Law Firm and Murray, Frank & Sailer, LLP. According to www.parkbarbrisettlement.com, those potentially affected by the suit are "all individuals, law firms, or other Persons who have paid the entire cost of one or more qualifying BAR/BRI bar review courses in the United States during the period March 15, 2001 to January 4, 2008, inclusive (the "Class Period")." If you were part of this class action suit and have any questions, you should contact The Katriel Law Firm.

Rate This Article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Select    View top rated articles

Printable Version    PDF Version    Email to a Friend    Post A Comment    View Comment    Discuss

	Popular Tags
	Thomson Corporation  settlements  lawsuits  antitrust laws  Canada  courses  Rodriguez  BAR/BRI  West Publishing  organizations

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing is a simply great site to use and I strongly recommend it to others. Eric

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #136: Our researchers spend thousands of hours per week searching more than 250,000 employer websites, newspapers, and job boards so you do not have to.

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!" Comments

Article ID: 4588     Article Title: Antitrust Class Action Suit Approved Against BAR/BRI Comment not found for this article. Comment

Facebook comments:

Enjoyed reading this article? Click here to sign up for News Wire, our weekly newsletter, and you'll receive articles just like this right in your inbox.

Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now! Every Alert Alert once a day