Deans Clash on Rankings Boycott
Are you an Employer?    Attract the Best Candidates with Smart Job Postings! Search Legal Resumes
Legal Jobs Board for Attorneys, Law Students & Legal Staff | Serving USA & Other Countries | LawCrossing

Need Help? Call (800) 973-1177 

Job Seeker Login   Employer Login 

Job Seekers?  Try it Now  

ATTORNEY JOBS
LAW STUDENT JOBS
LEGAL STAFF JOBS
Download LawCrossing Online Apps: Click here  
Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
What Are You Looking For:

United States

+Advanced search

Legal Jobs >> Legal Articles >> Legal Daily News Feature >> Deans Clash on Rankings Boycott
  • Legal Daily News Feature

Deans Clash on Rankings Boycott


by      
Printable Version PDF Version Email to a Friend
Subscribe to LawCrossing  
 Share on Facebook
 Twitter

Like LawCrossing on Facebook


07/28/08

Competition over the rankings is intense, and many law school deans have attempted to buoy up their rankings in some fashion. One tactic has been to cut the number of students accepted in the first year classes while increasing part-time attendance, such as those in joint JD programs as well as those who take classes at night. This also has the benefit of providing legal education to those with careers or who otherwise cannot take classes during the traditional time.

When US News announced that they are considering changing how they rank part-time students — pooling those student test scores with the full time students' — many law schools raised quite the furor over it.

According to US News, some schools apparently move lower testing students into their part-time programs so as not to impact their rankings. Thus, "one way to prevent gaming of the system is to count [grade and test data of] all students,'' according to Robert Morse. Morse is the director of data research for US News.

Several law school deans have opposed this change, saying that their ranking by US News is so important that they might have to drop part-time programs rather than slip in the rankings. The dean of Case Western Reserve University Law School, Gary J. Simson, called for a boycott by law schools of the US News rankings.

US News gets much of their information directly from the law schools themselves, so this boycott would be designed to cut off access to that data, in theory rendering the US News rankings pointless.

Several deans have agreed on the need to cut down the importance of the rankings, but many state they aren't sure how. The idea of getting rid of the rankings "is whistling in the wind," said Lawrence Ponoroff, dean of Tulane University Law School. Tulane was No. 44 in U.S. News' 2008 rankings of the 184 accredited law schools in the nation.

Why the disconnect? If rankings are so important to the job prospects of the students of those schools, why the resignation and acceptance of a flawed system?

The answer lies in the US News methodology. While law schools provide much of the information, US News gets lots of information from required disclosures to the American Bar Association. If the law schools don't cough up the information, the reliance on the ABA information will increase, leading to even more perceived errors. Law schools cannot prevent anyone from accessing the data from the ABA.

What the boycott would get rid of would be the "reputation" component of the rankings, which in theory ask law professors and deans to rank other schools. That most likely means more gaming of the ABA numbers to influence the rankings.

Simson, the Dean at Case Western, argues that without the deans' participation, the rankings will crumble by causing others to not provide the requested information.

Bob Morse from US News disagrees, taking the understandable view that his process is fair and not flawed, and that a dean boycott would have little impact.

Regardless of the eventual outcome of this, students in lower ranked schools hope the rankings crumble, leading to greater access to legal jobs for them.
If this article has helped you in some way, will you say thanks by sharing it through a share, like, a link, or an email to someone you think would appreciate the reference.



Facebook comments:



Featured Testimonials

I used LawCrossing and found its huge volume of listings to be perfect. I loved using it.
Joanna

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #96: We can’t promise you a job, but we can promise to make the job search a whole lot easier!


total jobs
75,126
Upload Your Resume
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
14,355
Job of the day

Litigation Attorney in Indianapolis, IN
USA-Indianapolis
Senior Anti-Corruption Consultant - Risk Consulting The candidate will perform fraud and forensic investigations; exper...

apply for free
 
job search tip
Important interview props-paper and pen. On the pad of paper include your five interview questions along with any major points about your background you want to cover in the interview.

Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.


Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.