The reproductive tendencies of Americans have been in the spotlight in recent weeks in light of a new report which claims that abortion rates have fallen in the United States to their lowest levels since 1976. The report from the nonprofit Alan Guttmacher Institute also mentions something which might startle casual observers of the abortion debate: one in five American pregnancies ends in abortion — despite the fact that abortion rates declined by 9% between 2000 and 2005 alone.
The Centers for Disease Control announced in December that for the first time in 14 years, teenage pregnancy rates are on the rise.
Pro-choice and anti-abortion activists have been quick to take credit for the decline, claiming that widespread access to birth control and fewer abortion facilities nationwide have helped bring about the decline.
But the emotional debate over abortion frequently eclipses what should be of equal concern to the national discourse on reproduction: teen pregnancy. The Centers for Disease Control announced in December that for the first time in 14 years, teenage pregnancy rates are on the rise.
Oddly enough, no group was clamoring to take credit for this particular swing in numbers, though the response from certain quarters was less than surprising. Dr. Gary Rose, chief executive of the Medical Institute for Sexual Health and one of the nation's most prominent conservative abstinence advocates, proclaimed, "Like casual drug use in the 60s, America's current culture has accepted casual and 'protected' sex as the norm. There is a critical need for behavior modification — risk avoidance, not mere risk reduction — if these trends are to reverse."
Any response to Rose's myopia beyond eye rolling is difficult as he fails to understand a plain fact: the rise in teen pregnancy has coincided with the proliferation of abstinence-only programs in the nation's schools — programs which trace their inception back to 1996 when Bill Clinton signed into law a welfare reform bill which included abstinence-only education. When George Bush took office, funding for the program expanded to a massive $176 million in 2007 alone. All told, such programs have gobbled up over $1 billion of taxpayer funds and produced few of their intended results. To gain some perspective on whether this is money well spent, consider this: teen births cost the federal government at least $9.1 billion in 2004, accounting collectively for healthcare, child welfare, incarceration, and lower tax revenue costs.
Of course, "sex" is still a source of shame and embarrassment for many parents, some of whom have gone so far as to sponsor what are known as "purity balls" in which teenage daughters pledge their virginity to their fathers who in turn vow to protect their chastity. Aside from the fact that the whole thing smacks of a grotesquely atavistic and patriarchal ideology, it is worth noting that nearly 90% of girls who make such chastity pledges end up breaking them. Additionally, these girls are less likely to use condoms when they do become sexually active, having forgone basic sexual education, which leaves them at a distinct disadvantage when the need for testing and STD treatment arises.
There is, however, a grain of truth in Rose's claim: America (and the rest of the modern world) has accepted "protected" sex as the norm. And much to his chagrin, the cultural winds are blowing in a decidedly sex-positive direction: the critical and popular acceptance of Juno, a film dealing with the sordid and silly complexities of teenage pregnancy, and the recent disclosure by teen television star Jamie Lynn Spears that she is pregnant at the age of 16 clearly signal that sexual attitudes in America are shifting.
Thanks so much. I actually ended up getting a job through your service. It's definitely a great site. Jennifer
Facts
LawCrossing Fact #139: Keep checking the site daily for updated job listings.
Enjoyed reading this article? Click here to sign up for News Wire, our weekly newsletter, and you'll receive articles just like this right in your inbox.
Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now!
Reason 41: LawCrossing ensures that the jobs you apply for are still open. You don't have to waste time applying for positions that have already been filled.
Description:
Manchester office seeks solicitor with 3+ years of pqe to undertake a mix of commercial and finance litigation work. Applications from candidates with pure commercial litigation or pure finance litigation experience, as well as those with a mix of both will be considered.
