10/26/07 The attorney even provided the couple with a copy of an answer to their summons and complaint, dated August 13, 2003. The case? Jeff and Deborah Yahney "accused [their neighbors] Joe and Orsola Wolforst of negligently building a retaining wall and berm, resulting in water damage to the Yahneys' property due to the changed grade of their land." In June 2003, the Yahneys hired Laurence S. Jurman to sue their neighbors. A few days later, "a summons and complaint was filed in Suffolk County Supreme Court and an index number assigned." And the Yahneys believed their case was well on its way. As they should, with Jurman reassuring them that everything was proceeding normally. The attorney even provided the couple with a copy of an answer to their summons and complaint, dated August 13, 2003. Jurman also "advised the Yahneys that the Wolforsts had retained Ciotti & Damm of Mineola, N.Y., and that they had moved to vacate the defendants' previously adjudicated default. Around June of this year, Jurman allegedly told the Yahneys that [Supreme Court Justice William] Rebolini had denied the Wolforsts' motion to vacate the default, and then showed them the purported order. He advised them that he was preparing for a trial on damages that remained unscheduled," says an article on Law.com. It was later discovered, however, that Jurman allegedly forged Rebolini's signature that said he had denied the motion. Growing impatient at the pace of their case, the Yahneys investigated on their own and "discovered that their summons and complaint had not been served on the defendants; that the action had never been assigned to a Judicial Part; and that no motions were interposed herein nor orders issued by the court in this action," wrote Burke. The Yahneys fired Jurman, filed another complaint, and hired new attorney, Harvey Savitt, to take over the case. Savitt said, "They had an attorney who convinced them that everything was hunky-dory." Jurman appeared in court and pleaded not guilty to possessing a forged document. If, however, he is found guilty, he could face 2 1/3 to 7 years in prison.

Rate This Article 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Select    View top rated articles

On The Net Suffolk County Supreme Court www.nycourts.gov/courts/10jd/suffolk/supreme.shtml Ciotti & Damm www.cdkesqs.com Mineola, NY www.mineola-ny.gov    Printable Version    PDF Version    Email to a Friend    Post A Comment    View Comment    Discuss

	Popular Tags
	Jeff  complaints  property  attorneys  Joe  June 2003  New York  water damage

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing is a very good site and its customer service is really great! Deirdre

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #77: Users will find their dream jobs more easily when they search using keywords because it will help narrow their job searches.

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!" Comments

Article ID: 3666     Article Title: NY Attorney Allegedly Forges Judge's Signature Comments: Today, Nov. 21, 2008 Mr. Jurman was sentenced to 5 years probation and ordered to make restitution to some of his damaged clients and he was ordered to make full restitution for his embezzlement of his only employees tax withholdings, which he had committed over 5 years. Sadly, many of his victims remain financially ruined by his illegile activities; for some victims there was no monetary justice from the Courts for them, despite their financial ruination by Mr. Jurman. Hopefully the Feds will render the justice that only a federal crime, such as this Judical Forgery crime is, deserves--time in prision and FULL restitution to all the victims no matter how long it may take him to repay them. Posted by: Jane Smithe   |   Date: 11-21-2008 Comment

Facebook comments:

Enjoyed reading this article? Click here to sign up for News Wire, our weekly newsletter, and you'll receive articles just like this right in your inbox.

Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now! Every Alert Alert once a day