log in 

JOB SEEKERS, Try it Now 

EMPLOYERS, POST LEGAL JOBS | SEARCH LEGAL RESUMES

ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS LEGAL STAFF

See Legal Jobs We Have Recently Researched and Located for You

What Where
Show Recruiter Jobs  What's this?

Show Refreshed Jobs  What's this?

Job Type:
Employer Type:
+ Browse Legal Jobs     + Advanced Search     + Search Tips
Legal Jobs >> Legal Articles >> Court Reporter >> The Purging Of Justice Thomas
  • Court Reporter
The Purging of Justice Thomas

by James Kilpatrick     
William Congreve answered the first question three centuries ago: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

The second question is tougher. An easy answer is that Justice Thomas did it for money — that is, that he wrote this painful memoir mainly for the $1.5 million advance he received from HarperCollins. A better answer lies in the theory of catharsis, "a purification of the emotions that brings about spiritual renewal or release from tension." Sixteen years after his agonizing confirmation to the Supreme Court, Thomas had to pull this festering splinter: He would write the pain out of his system. Now! Done! But pus is pretty only to the patient.

In an engrossing account of his boyhood in Pinpoint, Ga., Thomas starts with his hardscrabble beginnings:

"I was 9 years old when I met my father. His name was M.C. Thomas, and my birth certificate describes him as a 'laborer.'"

The meeting took place at a housing project where the father was visiting. Thomas and his younger brother arrived on schedule:

"'I am your daddy,' he told us in a firm, shameless voice that carried no hint of remorse for his inexplicable absence from our lives. He said nothing about loving or missing us, and we didn't say much in return — it was as though we were meeting a total stranger — but he treated us politely enough, and even promised to send us a pair of Elgin watches with flexible bands, which were popular at the time. Though we watched the mail every day, the watches never came."

In the 1950s, Pinpoint, 10 miles southeast of Savannah, "was too small to be properly called a town. No more than a hundred people lived there, most of whom were related to me in one way or another. Their lives were a daily struggle for the barest of essentials, food, clothing and shelter. Doctors were few and far between, so when you got sick, you stayed that way, and often you died of it.

"The house in which I was born was a shanty with no bathroom and no electricity except for a single light in the living room. Kerosene lamps lit the rest of the house. In the wintertime was plugged up the cracks and holes in the walls with old newspapers. Water came from a nearby faucet. We carried it through the woods in old lard buckets ..."

Readers who skip the middle chapters of Thomas' memoir do themselves a disservice. Eventually his race would become the decisive factor in his career, but along the way he provided evidence of real guts and modest talent. Then came his rise to become chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), his elevation to a circuit judgeship, and finally in the summer of 1991 his nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States.

If Thomas had ended his memoir at that point he would have had a good book but no bonanza. For his own integrity — and to earn that fat advance — he had publicly to squeeze the festering boil. Without the final 50 pages there would have been no marketable book. So, Anita Hill had defamed him. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee had listened to her lies. He was fed up:

"This is a circus. It is a national disgrace, and from my standpoint, as a black American, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that, unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you, you will be lynched."

Permit me a personal word: My beloved wife, Hearst columnist Marianne Means, has a very different view of Justice Thomas and his book. Last week she characterized his memoir as 289 pages of whine. In her biased view, Anita Hill was a Teller of Truth, a veritable Joan of Arc.

In my own biased view, Hill was a vengeful woman who was determined to get back at a man who clearly thought she was less than wonderful. She has never been able to explain why she followed Thomas — this beast, this awful person, this tawdry, hyper-sexed, utterly detestable creep! — from one job to another. But let it go. To each his own catharsis.

I wish Thomas had not published this book. Now can I go to sleep?

(Letters to Mr. Kilpatrick should be sent by email to kilpatjj@aol.com.)

COPYRIGHT 2007 UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE

This feature may not be reproduced or distributed electronically, in print or otherwise without the written permission of uclick and Universal Press Syndicate.

Rate This Article
   Current rating: 1   |   View top rated articles

Printable Version    Printable Version PDF Version    PDF Version Email to a Friend    Email to a Friend
Comment    Post A Comment View Comment    View Comment Discuss    Discuss
Popular Tags
 Supreme Court  Anita Hill  housing projects  Joan of Arc  Dr. Elgin  Marianne Means  Clarence Thomas  memoirs  patients  living room

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing has many features available on its website, the best being the e-alerts. It is a well managed website.
Prescilla

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #177: We monitor what’s going on in the market overall, bringing you the latest updates!

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!"

Comments


Article ID: 3655    

Article Title: The Purging of Justice Thomas

Comment not found for this article.

Comment Comment

Facebook comments:

try it now

Enjoyed reading this article?
Click here to sign up for News Wire, our weekly newsletter, and you'll receive articles just like this right in your inbox.

Jd Journal - Send Tips
JDJournal

Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now!



Every Alert

Alert once a day

 


total jobs
137,258
Upload Your Resume
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
13,832
SIGN UP NOW
*Email:
VeriSign Secure Site  
Only LawCrossing consolidates every job it can find in the legal industry and puts all of the job listings it locates in one place.

  • We have more than 25 times as many legal jobs as any other job board.
  • We list jobs you will not find elsewhere that are hidden in small regional publications and employer websites.
  • We collect jobs from more than 250,000 websites and post them on our site.
  • We do not charge employers when we post their listings.
  • We are private, and therefore far fewer people are applying for the jobs on our site than are applying for those on public job boards.
Facebook Twitter
BCG Attorney Search
Real-Time Job Updates
Sign up free and receive new jobs by email as soon as they become available.

First Name


Email


Areas of Practice


Regions of Interest


post your resume
  • Make your resume viewable to thousands of employers.
  • Employers can look you up in our database.
  • Get job alerts based on your resume.
upload your resume


Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.


Employment Research Institute