Decent Loss?

28 Views
According to the FCC's website, "Profane language includes those words that are so highly offensive that their mere utterance in the context presented may, in legal terms, amount to a 'nuisance.' In its Golden Globes Awards Order, the FCC warned broadcasters that, depending on the context, it would consider the 'F-Word' and those words (or variants thereof) that are as highly offensive as the 'F-Word' to be 'profane language' that cannot be broadcast between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m."

However, at the Billboard Music Awards show in 2002 and 2003, Cher uttered the phrase "F— 'em," while Nicole Richie said, "Have you ever tried to get cow s— out of a Prada purse? It's not so f-— simple." Both shows aired on the Fox Network.



The FCC is concerned that if expletives like these are allowed anywhere at anytime, family-friendly programming will be hard to come by.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said in an article on http://money.cnn.com that he "found it hard to believe that the New York court would tell American families that the obscenities aired would be acceptable on broadcast television when children are most likely to be in the audience."

"If we can't prohibit the use [of the two obscenities] during prime time," Martin continued, "Hollywood will be able to say anything they want, whenever they want."

Fox Broadcasting however, "praised the ruling, saying 'government regulation of content serves no purpose other than to chill artistic expression in violation of the First Amendment.' It said viewers can decide appropriate viewing content for themselves, using parental control technologies," says on article on www.abcnews.go.com.

In the same article, the FCC, regardless of losing this decency battle, claims they will not change their "legal obligation to enforce the indecency statue."

"So any broadcaster who sees this decision as a green light to send more gratuitous sex and violence into our homes would be making a huge mistake," said Michael J. Copps, a FCC Commissioner. "The FCC has a duty to find a way to breathe life into the laws that protect our kids."



Featured Testimonials

I got a job using LawCrossing...and the listings were pretty updated and very comprehensive.
Marc


Facts

LawCrossing Fact #29: There is no other law job website available that delivers the volume of jobs and specificity that LawCrossing does.

 

NOW TRENDING ON BCG ATTORNEY SEARCH

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Testimonial of the Week

LawCrossing has the most listings of any job board I have used. It's actually a great site. The website had a lot of detail. It’s nice that you don't have to go through a recruiter if you don't want to. You can actually contact the law firm directly for the positions listed. LawCrossing had a ton of great features.
  • Brian McMillan San Francisco, CA
Job of the Day

Litigation Attorney in San Francisco, CA

USA-San Francisco

Field Counsel - Civil Litigation Attorney - Grade 90 The candidate will represent the company and its policyholders in ...

Employer: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Job Search Tip

Bring extra copies of your resume with you. Never assume the interviewer can find your resume.