Are you an Employer?    Attract the Best Candidates with Smart Job Postings! Search Legal Resumes
Legal Jobs Board for Attorneys, Law Students & Legal Staff | Serving USA & Other Countries | LawCrossing

 
Job Seekers?   

Need Help? Call (800) 973-1177 
ATTORNEY JOBS
LAW STUDENT JOBS
LEGAL STAFF JOBS
Download LawCrossing Online Apps: Apple iOS
 
See Law Jobs We Have Recently Researched and Located for You
What Where
Show Recruiter Jobs  

Show Refreshed Jobs  



Search in Job Title Only
Location 
Job Type:
Employer Type:

+ Browse Legal Jobs     + Advanced Search     + Search Tips     + Upload Legal Resume
Legal Jobs >> Legal Articles >> Legal Daily News Feature >> Supreme Court Warms To Global Warming Prevention
  • Legal Daily News Feature

Supreme Court Warms to Global Warming Prevention


by Charisse Dengler     

Supreme Court Warms to Global Warming Prevention
The Court ruled that it's time for the EPA to take action regarding global warming.
The Bush administration also feels that since these gas emissions are slated to spike in the near future due to countries such as India and China, it would be pointless to try and make a difference in the level of greenhouse emissions here in the U.S. However, Justice John Paul Stevens disagrees.

"A reduction in domestic emissions would slow the pace of global emissions increases, no matter what happens elsewhere," he wrote in the Court's opinion.

The Supreme Court's ruling is music to the ears of many people throughout the nation who have felt that the EPA has been given the power to be a major combatant in the fight to stop global warming, but has not been using its power.

Other justices besides Stevens that were in disagreement included Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Justice Clarence Thomas.

While the Court found that Massachusetts is already suffering from the affects of global warming due to greenhouse-gas emissions (which can be seen in its disappearing coast lines), Justice Roberts feels that there is no connection between Massachusetts' coast line and global warming.
Related Article
Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Question of Law Regarding Class-action



On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider the constitutionality of a legal tactic that can influence the capacity of companies to defend against class-action lawsuits. The question of law raised in Standard Fire Insurance Co v. Knowles, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 11-1450 is as follows: ....

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Jefferson’s Appeal



On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal against his conviction by former Louisiana congressman William Jefferson. Jefferson who became famous for “cold cash” after FBI agents found $90,000 wrapped in foil and stored in the freezer at his residence was convicted in 2009 on multiple cha ....

Supreme Court Reacts to Wal-Mart Sex-Bias Case

Last week, on March 29th, the Supreme Court seemed to be gearing up to block a sex discrimination lawsuit against the world's largest employer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The lawsuit, which was initially filed ten years ago by six female Wal-Mart employees, has grown to include as many as 1.5 million female worker ....

The Court also ruled last Monday that Duke Energy Corp. will be required to meet new and improved standards regarding harmful emissions. The case was Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp., and the decision was unanimous.

"This is a huge win for clean air," Environmental Defense President Fred Krupp said in a statement to the Legal Times. "The Court ruled unanimously that companies have to use the latest cost effective technology to reduce pollution when they upgrade their plants. This is not a legal abstraction—it means we'll have cleaner air and less childhood asthma."
Share      
     
Rate This Article
   View top rated articles
On The Net


Legal Times
www.law.com/jsp/dc/index.jsp

The Supreme Court
www.supremecourtus.gov

Environmental Protection Agency
www.epa.gov


Printable Version    Printable Version PDF Version    PDF Version Email to a Friend    Email to a Friend
Comment    Post A Comment View Comment    View Comment Discuss    Discuss
Popular Tags
 Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency  Environmental Protection Agency  Supreme Court  global warming  China  John Paul Stevens  Bush administration  Supreme Court ruled  Massachusetts  bold

Featured Testimonials

The website is very user-friendly.
Joshua

Facts

LawCrossing Fact #106: We’ve got great resources. Behind every great search engine are a lot of great search engines. Get all your results here!

"We want to hear your thoughts. Please comment on this article (below)!"

Comments


Article ID: 2867    

Article Title: Supreme Court Warms to Global Warming Prevention

Comment not found for this article.

Comment Comment

Facebook comments:


total jobs
95,248
Upload Your Resume
New Legal Jobs in Last 7 Days
10,476
Facebook Twitter
job search tip
Always be organized. Maintain files of all companies you're interested in, ads you've responded to, letters you've written.
LawCrossing



The Job Search Program that Guarantees Success.
Our career counselor creates a tailor-made job search strategy for you and walks you through every step of the process.
Create your unique brand for just $2,495!
2013 Most Influential Legal Recruiter Rankings
Get the ranking

Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.




Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.