Copyright Law & New Technologies: How the Supreme Court's decision in MGM v. Grokster will affect millions of technically savvy Americans - and our modern toys.

25 Views
<<This result is different from the Napster case, in which the lower courts ruled that the service clearly was in violation of copyright law. "The other piece of good news is that the court did affirm the Sony standard. Under the Sony standard, a creator of new technology that permits copying is not liable if the technology has substantial non-infringing uses. Liability rests on the design and uses of the technology. The lower court held that Grokster and Streamcast are not liable under the Sony standard because of the design of the P2P service permitting non-infringing uses. The Supreme Court, however, concluded that the lower court had misapplied the Sony standard by focusing exclusively on the question of design and not enough on the intent of the creators of Grokster and Streamcast."

Here's where the bad news starts. "The Supreme Court basically created another way for the creator of new technology to be liable for copyright infringement," he says. "If the creator intended to induce copyright infringement, then the creator can also be found liable. To quote the court: 'One who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.'"



After today's decision, there are two potential pitfalls for creators of new technology, according to Ghosh. "The first, under Sony, is to create technology that because of its design and uses has primarily infringing uses," he says. "The second, under Grokster, is to create technology with the intent to induce infringement by third parties. The Sony standard focuses on the design of the technology, the Grokster standard on the intent of the creator. Even if the design of technology may have a lot of non-infringing uses—as Grokster and Streamcast allegedly did—the creator of new technology still can be found liable if his purpose in creating the technology was to permit copyright infringement.

In Sony, the court borrowed from the law on contributory infringement in patent law; in Grokster, the court borrowed from patent law's rules about inducement. "In its defense," Ghosh added, [the Grokster] opinion, totaling more than 50 pages in length, did show sensitivity to the arguments about technological innovation that were raised in the litigation. However, the decision also complicates copyright law by creating a new—and questionable—legal standard. Only future cases will tell how this standard will affect P2P and other technologies."

From the University at Buffalo Law School Newspaper, The Opinion
 

Featured Testimonials

LawCrossing is a quick search website with beautiful options. It was a pleasure to have an opportunity to use LawCrossing.
Robin


Facts

LawCrossing Fact #8: LawCrossing is the only job board that seeks out jobs instead of just waiting for them to come to it.


Date
Location
Job Title
May 03, 16
US-DC-Washington
Intellectual Property Attorney in Washington, DC
Law Firm, 3-5 yrs required
Associate Attorney - Trademark & Copyright Litigation The candidate must have 3-5 ...
May 03, 16
US-WA-Seattle
Intellectual Property Attorney in Seattle, WA
Law Firm, 3-6 yrs required
Seeking Trademark & Copyright Associate with 3-6 years of relevant trademark experien...
Apr 27, 16
US-CO-Denver
Intellectual Property Attorney in Denver, CO
Law Firm, Min 3 yrs required
Trademark and Copyright Associate The candidate should have 3+ years of experience i...
Job of the Day

Banking Attorney in New York City, NY

USA-New York City

Global Merchant Services Counsel Duties: Strategically collaborate with all levels within GMS in negotiating complex ...

Employer: American Express Company

Job Search Tip

Before an interview, review your successes. What were they? How did you make them happen? What achievement are you proudest of? Can you tell them in 60 seconds or less?