Copyright Law & New Technologies: How the Supreme Court's decision in MGM v. Grokster will affect millions of technically savvy Americans - and our modern toys.

28 Views
<<This result is different from the Napster case, in which the lower courts ruled that the service clearly was in violation of copyright law. "The other piece of good news is that the court did affirm the Sony standard. Under the Sony standard, a creator of new technology that permits copying is not liable if the technology has substantial non-infringing uses. Liability rests on the design and uses of the technology. The lower court held that Grokster and Streamcast are not liable under the Sony standard because of the design of the P2P service permitting non-infringing uses. The Supreme Court, however, concluded that the lower court had misapplied the Sony standard by focusing exclusively on the question of design and not enough on the intent of the creators of Grokster and Streamcast."

Here's where the bad news starts. "The Supreme Court basically created another way for the creator of new technology to be liable for copyright infringement," he says. "If the creator intended to induce copyright infringement, then the creator can also be found liable. To quote the court: 'One who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.'"



After today's decision, there are two potential pitfalls for creators of new technology, according to Ghosh. "The first, under Sony, is to create technology that because of its design and uses has primarily infringing uses," he says. "The second, under Grokster, is to create technology with the intent to induce infringement by third parties. The Sony standard focuses on the design of the technology, the Grokster standard on the intent of the creator. Even if the design of technology may have a lot of non-infringing uses—as Grokster and Streamcast allegedly did—the creator of new technology still can be found liable if his purpose in creating the technology was to permit copyright infringement.

In Sony, the court borrowed from the law on contributory infringement in patent law; in Grokster, the court borrowed from patent law's rules about inducement. "In its defense," Ghosh added, [the Grokster] opinion, totaling more than 50 pages in length, did show sensitivity to the arguments about technological innovation that were raised in the litigation. However, the decision also complicates copyright law by creating a new—and questionable—legal standard. Only future cases will tell how this standard will affect P2P and other technologies."

From the University at Buffalo Law School Newspaper, The Opinion
 


Featured Testimonials

The site is user-friendly
Mark


Facts

LawCrossing Fact #121: We know how to get results. Whether you’re just out of school or looking for a career change, we know how to move you in the right direction.


Location
Atlanta, GA
Description
Trademark Paralegal The candidate will support Trademark practice. Will work on matters relating to...
Apply now  
Location
Chicago, IL
Description
Senior Level Trademark Attorney The candidate will work in firm's Intellectual Property and Technol...
Apply now  
Location
Louisville, KY
Description
Intellectual Property Partner The candidate should have experience in patents, trademarks, copyrigh...
Apply now  
Location
Louisville, KY
Description
Intellectual Property Associate The candidate should have experience in patents, trademarks, copyri...
Apply now  
Location
Boston, MA
Description
Electronics / Software Patent Lawyer The candidate will be responsible for: preparing and filing pa...
Apply now  
Location
Boston, MA
Description
Seeking an Intellectual Property Director for preparing and filing patent applications in the U.S. P...
Apply now  
 

NOW TRENDING ON BCG ATTORNEY SEARCH

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

Testimonial of the Week

LawCrossing has the most listings of any job board I have used. It's actually a great site. The website had a lot of detail. It’s nice that you don't have to go through a recruiter if you don't want to. You can actually contact the law firm directly for the positions listed. LawCrossing had a ton of great features.
  • Brian McMillan San Francisco, CA
Job of the Day

Tax Resolution Attorney

San Juan, PR

Community Tax, LLC (CTAX) Is a U.S. Based nationally known and respected tax resolution and tax services firm, based in ...

Employer: Community Tax, LLC

Job Search Tip

While job hunting take a class or go to school at night. The more skills you have, the more employable you are. Schools are great places to network, too.